翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ R-23 (missile)
・ R-25 Vulkan
・ R-26 (missile)
・ R-26 (salon)
・ R-27 (air-to-air missile)
・ R-27 Zyb
・ R-29 Vysota
・ R-29RM Shtil
・ R-29RMU Sineva
・ R-29RMU2 Layner
・ R-3 (tank)
・ R-3 motorway (Spain)
・ R-30490
・ R-31 (missile)
・ R-33 (missile)
R v Sinclair
・ R v Skinner
・ R v Smith (1900)
・ R v Smith (1987)
・ R v Smith (1992)
・ R v Smith (Thomas Joseph)
・ R v Soqokomashe
・ R v Sparrow
・ R v Spencer
・ R v Starr
・ R v Steane
・ R v Stephens
・ R v Stevens
・ R v Steyn
・ R v Stillman


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

R v Sinclair : ウィキペディア英語版
R v Sinclair

''R v Sinclair'' is a leading case from the Supreme Court of Canada on a detainee's right to counsel under section 10(b) of the ''Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Specifically, the case addresses two issues regarding the police's implementation duty under the right to counsel: 1) does a detainee have the right to have a lawyer present during police questioning, and 2) does a detainee have the right to make multiple phone calls to their lawyer. A majority of the Court answered the first question in the negative, and answered the second question in the negative, subject to a change of circumstances. The parties to the case were the appellant, Sinclair, the respondent, the Attorney General of British Columbia, and the following interveners: the Attorney General of Ontario, the Director of Public Prosecutions of Canada, the Criminal Lawyers' Association of Ontario, the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association. The case was part of a trilogy of cases released by the Supreme Court, along with ''R v Willier'' and ''R v McCrimmon''.
==Background==


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「R v Sinclair」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.